Now go with how to correctly remove InstallPKG 0.1.3. If you happen to be a newbie of Mac Computer, take the chance to learn something. ![]() ![]() This page can help you understand the basic knowledge of system maintenance, guiding you through the confusion of removal problems. InstallBuilder (disclaimer, I'm one of the developers).Removals on macOS are quite different from those on Microsoft Windows OS. For this cases there are other installer solutions like our BitRock The end user requesting information required to install yourĪpplication, like the MySQL port and password or proxy information toĭownload requirements on the fly (or simply to make it look fancier Sometimes, as with complex server software, you need more flexibility, for example to show custom pages to Installation configuration, like selecting the installation drive. Or changing permissions) you can use a PKG installer (for example built using PackageMaker), which allowsĮxecuting some pre and post install scripts and support some basic Need to perform some operations over the machine (such as adding users Application folder (or any other location). In OS X, many applications are just created as a RelocatableĪpplication bundles that the user just need to copy to the It is greatly recommended to get more of a feel of how and why things go wrong, and what to avoid. More distribution tools expect DMG's than zip's, so there's that as well.īesides what Apple recommends and what is standard, common practice, there's this article: which discusses the why's and hows (although mainly for system administrators) of packaging for wider distribution. Even when flat, putting the pkg in a archive or disk image is recommended for flexibility. It drops its receipt and a bill or materials file into /private/var/db, and is therefore audit-able by the built-in command line pkgutil tool, described here: /articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.12/2512MacEnterprise-PackagesReceiptsandSnow/index.htmlĪ benefit of using the flat package format is you can pull things over the network more safely and efficiently, but it isn't as easy to work with as bundle packages if you are testing and modifying the package regularly, or iterating to ensure scripts that perform actions or checks work well. Which is transferred over http to a hidden folder, installs directly to Applications(after which the temporary folder it is downloaded to is deleted). The MAS is different: as of 10.7 it uses a package format (which debuted in 10.5) referred to as a flat package (really a xar archive, explanation here) Smaller developers usually tried to make their app installable via drag-drop, distributed in zip archives or disk images(for simplicity's sake). ![]() Until it's debut, what was standard for large companies was their own custom scripts rolled into an older-style 'bundle' package or using an executable like the VISE installer. Its usage is described here: /articles/mactech/Vol.25/25.03/2503MacEnterprise-PackagingforSystemAdministrators/index.html.īut as others have mentioned, the elephant in the room is the MacAppStore(MAS for short). app, as recommended by AppleĪn older marketing page on Apple's site says it's recommended to create packages (so the Installer application can move the bits in place) with the PackageMaker application.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |